patching...
Update: Keep up with Brookfield buzz — get our daily email with best of Brookfield: http://brookfield-wi.patch.com/newsletters
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

A Recount Of The 21st Senate District Recall? Wanggaard Undecided

With less than 800 votes making the difference, John Lehman is the unofficial winner of the 21st Senate recall election race to unseat Sen. Van Wanggaard. However, hundreds of absentee ballots have yet to be counted.

 

Unofficially, former state Sen. John Lehman unseated Sen. Van Wanggaard in the recall election for the 21st Senate District race.

Final, but-yet-to-be certified, election results show Lehman with a 1 percent lead over Wanggaard: 49.7 percent to 48.63 percent of the vote. A Democratic win means the state Senate would be under Democratic control. But there’s an asterisk at the end of these vote totals since hundreds of absentee ballots haven’t been counted, and the election hasn't been certified.

At midnight, Wanggaard said he felt the race was too close to call. As of Wednesday morning, he had not conceded the race. He issued a statement just before noon saying that while he is being urged to demand an immediate recount, he's going to wait until after the county completes their board of canvass.

Over 70,000 people voted yesterday in a historic election. We know that there are a number of outstanding absentee ballots, voting irregularities, and that there were problems across the county in the unofficial tally of ballots. People across the state and country have asked that I immediately ask for a recount. However, we all know that the best decisions are made when well-rested and after consideration of all options. We will closely monitor the canvass of votes with legal representation. We will evaluate our options regarding recounts following the official count of ballots.

A representative with Wanggaard's campaign would not comment further on the reference to "voting irregularities."

Racine County Clerk Wendy Christensen said all election results are unofficial until the county completes its Board of Review, which can't take place until each community conducts their own. But before any of that happens, Christensen and her deputies are busy verifying by hand the results transmitted last night.

"It takes all day," she noted. "And the municipalities have until 4 pm today to get their ballots and tapes here to the county."

There's also the question of absentee ballots. Christensen said there are 581 outstanding absentee ballots and seven provisional ballots yet to be counted and/or received in each community. Voters had to have their absentee ballot postmarked by June 5 and their municipal clerks have to receive them by 4 pm Friday to count.

Christensen said there's no telling how many of those will come in if she uses even the May 8 primary as a benchmark.

"We had 600 or 650 at that time, and only 30 or 40 came made it back in time to be counted," she added. "Really, it's anyone's guess as to how many might come in by Friday."

As for reports that the clerk's office won't declare a winner, Christensen reminds residents that it's not the clerk's job to declare a winner with unofficial results.

Since the margin of difference is more than one-half of one percent, Wanggaard would have to pay for a recount if he requests one. He has three days after the county finishes its Board of Canvass to make that decision.

Meanwhile, Lehman declared victory just before 1 a.m. Wednesday morning, before the unofficial vote totals were counted because he had poll watchers in the precincts.

Brad Wojciechowski, Communications Director for Lehman’s campaign said Lehman won the race by 779 votes.

“We have a new majority after the voters in the 21st District decided to restore checks and balances in our state government,” he said. “Majority leader Mark Miller will be willing to talk to the governor and assembly Republicans at any time in a responsible manner and not just to play it out for the media.”

Related Topics: John Lehman, Van Wanggaard, and Wisconsin Recalls

James R Hoffa

1:32 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Great article Patch!

I recommend that Van accept the official Board of Canvass results, as a recount would not be worth it based upon the recent recount of the Circuit Court race between Boyle and Nielsen, which was much tighter than this race was and didn't change the result of that election. The last thing we want is our very own Kloppy, although Van has already proven to have far more character and class than Kloppy.

The district that Lehman will be representing when he is actually sworn in to take his seat will be comprised of a constituency that CLEARLY doesn't want him, as the polls showed both last night and in the Wirch recall of last summer, as the areas of Wirch's district 22 that have since become part of district 21 went heavily for Republican Johnathan Steitz in that recall election. Clearly, the new district 21 is solidly conservative, while the new district 22 is solidly liberal.

In all honesty, this election represents a travesty, as now voters that don't want Lehman are stuck with him representing their interests until 2014. How is that a good exercise of democracy exactly? Especially seeing as how Lehman wasn't exactly thrilled about even running this time out, but was more or less recruited by the party into doing so due to lack of a viable alternative.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

1:33 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

While it would be possible and highly probable that a recall of Lehman would be successful, it wouldn't be worth it, as by the time he's eligible for recall and the election held, it would be less than a year before the general election anyway. Not to mention that conservatives stand a good chance at retaking the senate majority this November in the new districts before Lehman ever has a chance to vote 'nay' on anything, thus invalidating Lehman's win last night as nothing more than a fruitless moral victory at best.

My guess is that Wirch will represent the preferred candidate of choice in the new liberal super majority district 22. Lehman will disappear in 2014 after either refraining from running again or being rejected by the new conservative super majority district 21. If Wanggaard chooses to stay involved in politics, he'll be the step up man for district 21, otherwise I see a newcomer from the Burlington or surrounding area stepping up to take the reigns.

Comment_arrow

mau

4:23 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

I'm just so happy Scott, Rebecca and the other senators won. I'm not thrilled Van lost but like you said, this isn't permanent.

Comment_arrow

Lgbpop

8:51 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Funny, I was just thinking the Democrats' call for counting every vote and making every vote count would continue in this election as well. Suddenly, it's OK to not count hundreds of absentee votes?

Wanggaard's right whether you like it or not. What's the rush?

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

4:06 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

@Lgbpop -

I never said that Van should concede yet. That's why I expressly stated that any decision should be based off the "official Board of Canvass results," and not the unofficial results. Absentee ballots still need to be accounted for and there could be some errors in tabulation discovered during the canvass. When it's this close, it's best not to do anything until the official results have been certified. And that's exactly what Van is doing - waiting. Which is more than I can say for Lehman, who was so quick to declare victory, just like Kloppy. If the canvass shows that Van won - that would be fantastic! If the canvass shows that Van lost by 60 votes or more, then my original suggestion stands.

But, if the margin is within 60, then I would say that a recount is justified, but that Van should have his campaign pay for it as opposed to allowing the taxpayers to pick up the tab as Kloppy did, even though he'd be legally entitled to it.

mau

2:55 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

I was not surprised to see Wanggaard lose. I am looking forward to James A. Ladwig Racine County Executive to start moving up the political ladder.

Reply

thisismyusername

3:08 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Even if EVERY absentee ballot comes back (which they won't) & every person voted for Wanggard (which they didn't), he still doesn't have enough votes to win. Concede.

Reply

dee50

4:21 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Let's have a Recall.............I am guessing there will be more votes than originally counted for Lehman...........Let's do this and see what the true vote count is! Come on Republicans you must want this, right?

@Hoffa you stated: "While it would be possible and highly probable that a recall of Lehman would be successful"

Then let's do this Hoffa if you are so sure of yourself......BTW do you work for Patch cause you are consistently on here commenting or you just don't have a life?

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

4:14 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

@dee50 -

If you read my original comment in its entirety, then you'd see that I already laid out all the reasons as to why a recall of Lehman would not be worth the effort. There is no question in my mind that the voters of the new District 21 would outright reject Lehman, as we've already seen in both this election and the Wirch recall of last year, again, as I've already explained above.

But unlike liberals, conservatives have reserved recalls in this state solely for gross neglect or dereliction of the oath of office, as seen in last year's senate recalls and the failed attempted recall of Dale Schultz, as opposed to simple ideological/policy differences with the duly elected public official.

It's called accepting and having respect for the majority of the electorate's decision, something that your side needs a lot of work on!

Peach Tree

4:40 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Lehman winning doesn't mean anything anyway. Republicans will get the majority back in the November elections. So for now demo's have the majority over nothing!!!

Reply

dee50

4:44 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

@Peach----

Oh really, now all of a sudden you don't care who wins regardless what happens in November...Come on Republicans don't you want the REAL numbers? You mean you are going to give up that easy! I would like to see what the REAL vote count would turn out....Let's do this!

Reply

SkinnyDude

5:48 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

I am just glad Walker wiped out Barrett by even a larger margin. Van Wanggaard is the better man over Lehman but Racine has a history of cutting it's own throat as most with any type of Means flea the city because it is not a great place to live, send kids to school, have a business or feel safe from crime. The only thing growing is slums. The new districts will give Racine and Kenosha the liberal champion of their choice and the outlaying area will have the Conservative State representation they desire. Racine was once a pretty good city. The recent Census shows by its lowering population that people have made the choice to leave in very significant numbers. It's sad but the liberal mind set has killed the city. In As time goes on the city will be squeezing blood out of turnips for revenue as it never dawns on them to be fiscally responsible with tax payer money. So the tax payers leave the area.Van can pursure whatever course he feels is proper. That is his choice and call to make . I am sure Racine had some fraud . but HEY thats the liberal mind set he was up against.

Reply

dee50

6:06 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

@Skinny you wrote "I am sure Racine had some fraud . but HEY thats the liberal mind set he was up against."

Then let's RECOUNT those votes...........Come on I dare you and then we will see the real Fraud!

Reply
Comment_arrow

SkinnyDude

7:14 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Dee that's not my call. I was in Racine on election day .VOTER ID ends a lot of any doubt of fraud and a liberal judge put it on a shelf. Clearly it is the left that is PRO FRAUD ........zero doubt about that. Wonder how many votes Barrett got from people out of state, underage kids, illegal aliens,felons and grave yards? Think before you type.

Comment_arrow

dee50

8:53 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

@skinny

Do you people ever do any research besides relying on 20 second commercials from the likes of Koch..??? And besides I want a re-count and you don't....You are making me dizzy with your comments, you claim there was voter fraud then I say OK let's recount......

The Truth About Voter Fraud:

Usually, only a tiny portion of the claimed illegality is substantiated — and most of the remainder is either nothing more than speculation or has been conclusively debunked.

There have been a handful of substantiated cases of individual ineligible voters attempting to defraud the
election system. But by any measure, voter fraud is extraordinarily rare.

http://www.truthaboutfraud.org/pdf/TruthAboutVoterFraud.pdf

Comment_arrow

Tuco

8:39 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

@dee
Same day registration is an open invitation to voter fraud. Think about it!

dee50

9:00 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

@skinny...By the way I don't believe there was any Voter Fraud, but I do believe the college cheat "Walker" with his cronies the Koch brothers would not think twice about Election Fraud. BTW-These are two different things....

Reply

Tuco

8:38 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Van should concede. This would be a small step in healing the rift between both sides. Does it matter that lehman won? Yes. Will he be effective? No. November is coming. Enjoy the majority now. Too bad nothing will get done because the legistlature is out of session. Once the new districts are up and running I will be represented by conservatives and not the lehman's and mason's.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Heather Asiyanbi

8:42 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I think you all are raising a valid question about how Lehman's win matters. With the legislature not in session, 16 senators and all 99 Assembly seats up for grabs in November, is Lehman's win significant because it's tied to the historic recall or is it significant because of how it changes the balance in the state senate?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tuco

12:28 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

In all reality it is a moral victory for the Dems. Nothing more nothing less. The real proof will be in November.

Comment_arrow

mau

1:58 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

With what you say, with Lehman's victory possibly being a shallow victory, why were the democrats so adamant on recalling Wanggaard approximately 4 months before the November election. Was this symbolic recall worth the price of the dollars spent and resulted in so much hate.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

4:19 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

@mau -

The decision to recall Wanggaard by the left was not a tactical one at all - it was instead solely based on the emotional populist sentiment that the left had of Walker and the GOP's policy/agenda that was being carried out under his administration.

In other words - it was nothing but recall fever gone amuck!

Eric

8:50 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Tabulate and add the absentee/provisional ballots to the final vote count. See if the winning vote margin gets bigger or smaller, then determine if a recount is warranted.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Heather Asiyanbi

11:36 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

@Eric - I think that's what Wanggaard is waiting on before he makes a recount decision. Until the county conducts its board of canvass - which is after all the municipalities to do the same - results remain unofficial. Once the canvass is complete, the results become official.

dee50

11:23 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I ask why all of a sudden the Republicons are not adamant about a Recount? Very, very unusual if for any other reasons for bragging rights, which we all know how much politicians love this (including Koch). So strange for anybody that follows Politics!

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

3:53 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

@dee50 -

In the last two years, it has been your side that has constantly demanded recounts, not conservatives. Kloppy, Nielsen, etc. have all requested recounts in the last two years. Meanwhile, you can't name a single conservative in the state that has requested a recount during this time frame.

Why you ask?

Answer:

Conservatives are gracious losers, while liberals find it hard to accept the reality of their losses. Proof in the pudding was MSNBC's night of denial coverage that was so obvious, even Stewart of the Daily Show couldn't resist the opportunity to make fun!

Once the canvass is completed and the results certified, if it shows Lehamn won - that's great. Accept your win. Why are you so insistent upon a recount - especially when you've won?

All a recount will do is expose the cheating done by your side, which has already been well documented. Poll vans with the words "cash money" painted on the back and side windows, multiple voting by certain electors, the Lehman supporter who was ticketed for threatening to smash conservative voters heads to the sidewalk if they went into a certain polling location to vote (there is a police report), electioneering inside a polling location with Obama campaign posters, improper documents allowed for voter registration (change of address forms from the USPS that did not meet the 28 day residency requirement), etc.

mau

1:50 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

If this situation had been reversed, Lehman, the democrats and the recall gang would be screaming, pounding and in the media attention ad nauseam. Being the gentleman that Van is, they are doing what is their right.

From some of the "anecdotal stories" I have been hearing about voting day improprieties at the polls, it would be a good idea to verify the same-day registrations. I think there is some question as to what is acceptable ID for new or changes in voter registrations.

3. AT THE POLLING PLACE ON ELECTION DAY: If you wish to register to vote at your polling place, you must bring proof that you reside at your present location. For purposes of voter registration, acceptable forms of proof of residence must include:

A current and complete name, including both the given and family name; and
A current and complete residential address, including a numbered street address, if any, and the name of a municipality.

NOTE: Proof of residency is required for voter registration and must be current and valid. The purpose of the proof of residency document is to establish the voter’s current address, not to prove that the voter complies with the 28 consecutive day residency requirement. The voter’s sworn statement on the registration form that they meet the 28-day requirement shall be presumed to be true unless the inspector or a challenger has first-hand knowledge sufficient to question the certification.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Heather Asiyanbi

3:33 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

@mau - the poll workers in Mount Pleasant and Sturtevant were being diligent about checking the documents voters brought with them to register. I witnessed over and over again poll workers checking voter forms against the documents, and taking the necessary time to do so no matter how long the line was.

dee50

8:48 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

@Hoffa you wrote

"Conservatives are gracious losers"............Is that why you and almost of your Republicon buddies here on Patch consistently say there was Voter fraud regarding Lehman's win, but then again most of you don't want a recount. You justify that by stating you are good losers BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAA......You are the King of RIDICULOUS and might I add very HYPOCRITICAL!

I have spent enough of my time on these boards.......Most of you totally ignore facts and logic (using your brain) when presented to you, but carry on with your emotional rants.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

10:33 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I don't see where anyone said that voter fraud was present or used to steal the election - only that there is evidence of cheating by pro-Lehman groups, which I outlined the specifics of in my above post.

And what "facts" have I ignored and what conclusions that I presented are unsupported by "logic" exactly?

dee50

10:44 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Lastly, I would like to add this little bit of news:

Recall Election Fraud in Wisconsin? You Betcha!
June 7, 2012

"The early exit polls predicted the race between Walker and Barrett to be a virtual tie. A second round of exit polling data gave Walker a small lead over Barrett but was still too close to call. Let’s see, within one hour the election went from too close to call, to Walker winning by 7%, with only 21% of the votes counted and three counties still voting. In other words that 21% was the equivalent of 57% of the total vote. This is mathematically impossible; clearly the unadjusted exit polls in Wisconsin do not match the reported results, the adjusted results, of the popular vote.

The fact that 80% of the votes counted in this country are in the hands of Republican backed voting technology is probably the reason why whenever there’s a glitch in the voting machine it always skews red.

Reply

dee50

10:44 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Sue Wahl-Storbeck, one of the two people operating Command Central, the other being her step-son Aaron Storbeck, is the person responsible for programming 3,000 voting machines in 46 districts in the State of Wisconsin. Wahl-Storbeck’s resume includes a stint at ACS Enterprises, a data processing company out of Texas. I’m not sure what she did at the data processing company but I do know that she was fired for refusing to take the company’s annual ethics exam and when her unemployment was denied, because she refused to take the company’s annual ethics exam, she took it to court and lost. Given the fact that “whoever programs the PROM packs has the ability to inject all the machines with a virus that will flip votes only on Election Day,

Wisconsin though does not manually post check ballots without a recount request and an order from a judge, unless it’s a presidential election, so there is no way to know if the results reported by the computers reflect what the actual ballots say. Clearly there’s a question here as the unadjusted exit polls do not match the reported results, the adjusted results, of the popular vote, results, which were in Sue Wahl-Storbeck’s hands and the machines she programmed.

Hey Cons like I have said let's do that Recount and see where the REAL fraud is!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/06/07/recall-election-fraud-in-wisconsin-you-betcha/

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

11:37 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

@dee50 -

Well, if you want a recount so badly, then tell your boy Lehman to pay for a recount. There's nothing stopping him from requesting a recount, so long as he pays for it, is there?

BTW - A lefty liberal blog does not qualify as a reputable source of objective factual information.

Not to mention that you guys and the brad blog guy were saying the exact same crap before the Kloppy/Prosser recount. And how did that turn out again….

Not to mention that your analysis based on exit polling is severely flawed and highly illogical. When the election was called with 21% of precincts reporting, it showed a 20-point lead, and not a 7-point lead as your analysis erroneously suggests. And your analysis doesn't even show if those exit polls came from the early reporting precincts that you're now trying to link them to, so how exactly are you making a correlation here? Did the exit polling match the final results in the precincts in which they were conducted - your analysis doesn't say.

Exit polling in general has a proven track record of very high statistical margins of error, don't they?

"In other words that 21% was the equivalent of 57% of the total vote." This statement makes absolutely no sense. Where does the 57% number even come from? How does this relate to skewed and erroneous exit polling?

Let's get real and stick to the solid objective facts instead of unsupported and unfounded speculation, conjecture, supposition, and conspiracy theories.

dee50

12:30 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

@Hoffa you write "Not to mention that you guys and the brad blog guy were saying the exact same crap before the Kloppy/Prosser recount. And how did that turn out again…."

For anybody to suggest there was NO foul play involved from the original vote and recount from Kloppy/Prosser then you are in denial! No worries, I’m sure Kathy Nickolaus has a very nice Swiss account courtesy of Koch!

Also,

You say: "Exit polling in general has a proven track record of very high statistical margins of error, don't they?"

Wrong again Hoffa, exit polls are highly accurate. They remove most of the sources of potential polling error by identifying actual voters and asking them immediately afterward who they had voted for. Technologies such as electronic voting machines provide no confirmation that votes are counted as cast, and highly partisan election officials have the power to suppress votes and otherwise distort the count.

Remember Gore Vs Bush, but in reality hacking/distort has been happening prior to that election since voting machines.

http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/1970/

Here I even took the liberty to provide you with a video that was presented by one journalist that I'm sure you support, he's a Republicon:

Diebold voting machines critical flaws

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy1IlAXeV30

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

1:17 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

Exit polls are highly inaccurate as not everyone is polled and there is no guarantee that those who are polled answer the poll questions honestly, is there? Also, how do we know if the person taking the exit poll was accurately recording the information received from those being polled, as there's no safeguards in place to assure the integrity of the exit poll, is there? Not to mention that it matters where such polls are being conducted, doesn't it? And exit polling can be conducted in a very partisan fashion, just like any other poll.

They are essentially meaningless and have no bearing in today's reality.

dee50

12:34 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

One more thing you state "BTW - A lefty liberal blog does not qualify as a reputable source of objective factual information."

So, I am guessing by this statement that your ONLY source of information comes from the likes of Fox and Rush, sad!.........And for myself I watch, listen, and read from all (left and right) media. My mother always told me keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer......She was a very wise woman...

Reply

Wallace Karraker

12:45 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

Seriously, a 'virus' to flip votes a certain way? I work in the electronics industry and can tell you there are checks and balances that systems of this nature go through. Any company tasked with aresponsibilty of this magnitude have endless quality controls in place. What would be the result of a company caught up in an investigation if something was improperly programmed? The company, it's owners and it's employees would be crucified in the media. I have more faith in an electronic voting machine then some person with a spreadsheet and their personal computer crunching the numbers.

Reply

dee50

12:48 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

@Wallace....Did you watch the Video.......If not, come on I challenge you. Pretty easy and it's presented by Lou Dobbs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy1IlAXeV30

Reply

dee50

12:49 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

@ Wallace here's another one for you........

Vote Fraud - Diebold Whistleblower Speaks Out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_rMpQKqZhM&feature=related

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

1:07 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

@dee50 -

Well then, if the voting machines are all rigged to make sure that Republicans win every election, then how did Obama win in 2008? And given that the Democrats are uncorrupt, the people's champions, and supposed target of such machines, then why hasn't Holder launched an investigation into these vote-rigging machines?

Secret Swiss bank accounts of which there's not proof of, conspiracy theories about rigged voting machines that neither party has deemed to be a real issue worthy of investigation - this is honestly the best you've got to back up your claims of election fraud happening in the Kloppy/Prosser election? And you call this all fact?

Really???

For the record, I get all of my information unfiltered from the actual primary sources of such information. I don't rely upon secondary analysis, as Hoffa is actually capable of thinking for himself. And Hoffa prefers hard objective FACTS, of which you've yet to present any.

dee50

1:34 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

@Hoffa-Here's some information that will answer your first question regarding Obama's win.

http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/tag/unadjusted-exit-polls/

Regarding Kloppyy/Prosser, Kathy Nickolaus worked for Prosser years ago when he was a Republican assemblyman in Madison And she was granted immunity to testify during the 2002 Republican caucus investigations, concerning campaign finance violations by Republican legislators and their staff.

She had made a "human error" in recording vote totals, and that the real total is 7,500 more for Justice David Prosser than reported on election night. Nickolaus has insisted on keeping election data on her personal computer, under her personal control. Nickolaus has insisted on keeping elections data on a personal computer in her office--to which she alone has access--and rebuffed demands by auditors that she upgrade to a safer and more tamper-proof system. "Nickolaus said she decided to take the election data collection and storage system off the county's computer network - and keep it on stand-alone personal computers accessible only in her office - for security reasons. Plus how long did it take to get those votes.

Anyway's, there's a lot of other reasons to question this woman's integrity regardless if your a Dem or Repub, but then again I have to remind myself that you Hoffa are the type that would prefer to close your eyes to the obvious!

. .....LIKE I SAID earlier FOUL PLAY............Good night!

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

1:29 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

Ummm... yeah, the recount showed that actual physical ballots existed and supported the canvassed results reported by Kathy Nickolaus. And those ballots came from a precinct nearly 28 miles away from Nickolaus's central county clerk's office where she was present all election night. And the results from that precinct were posted on the precinct's web-site, as well as having been independently reported on by Patch, thus confirming their existence and absence from the initial county wide totals reported by Nickolous on election night. Not to mention that the state investigation led by special counsel found that there was no election fraud committed and that the error solely lied in omission of the vote tally's from that precinct in Nickolaus's initially reported county-wide tabulation.

Votes were not found and/or produced out of thin air, as you make it sound like happened in your assessment of the situation. Sorry, but the hard objective facts just don't support your loosely pieced together conspiracy theory.

Keith Ashley

12:24 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

Anyone familiar with the voters in this district ?
This election had about 1300 undervotes or write-ins presumably people voting for Walker and not voting for anyone for state senate given the numbers. On top of this at least 1,000 people voted for Walker and split their ballot voting for Lehman as well. Is there some local aspect to this election that would cause so many to split their votes ? Win or Lose I hope there is an investigation to track down everyone that used fake local addresses to register and vote. Clearly, Racine was the back-up plan for the dems/unions. There was no way the unions were going to go away empty handed after spending tens of millions on this recall.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

1:06 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

Walker received 36,505 votes in the District.

Wanggaard received 35,476 votes.

For a discrepancy of: 1,029 votes.

Barrett received 36,572 votes in the District.

Lehman received 36,255 votes.

For a discrepancy of: 317 votes.

There were 1,218 scattering and undervotes recorded in the senate race.

Conservative leaning precincts recorded nearly 2.8 times the number of undervotes in comparison to liberal leaning precincts. That translates to roughly 783 scattering and undervotes as supporting Walker, and 435 having supported Barrett.

Wanggaard's loss of support from Walker voters is over 3 times the amount of support that Lehman lost from Barrett supporters. If we eliminate Wanggaard's share of the scattering/undervotes from his discrepancy, that still leaves us with 246 cross-ticket votes - people that voted for both Walker and Lehman. While Barrett supporters strictly voted for Lehman.

Conclusion: Either something is off here, or lazy/traitorous conservatives cost Wanggaard the election.

Leave a comment