patching...
Update: Keep up with Brookfield buzz — get our daily email with best of Brookfield: http://brookfield-wi.patch.com/newsletters
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Right to Vote Must Be Protected, Not Tainted By Voting Irregularities

Is it just me or have we been in permanent “election mode” in Wisconsin and the nation for longer than I care to remember?  The election process is one of the greatest ways to for all of us to exercise the unmatched freedoms we have in America.  However, emotions this time around are running very high. Elections can be exhausting in the best of “normal” times – and our times are anything but normal.

This has resulted in bitter polarization along political party lines, undoubtedly one of the greatest polarizations of this sort in our nation’s history. Now, we stand at the threshold of another presidential election and numerous state and local races across the country. With so much at stake, the notion that fraud or bribery could influence the outcome of any race is a matter that needs to be examined with calm and serious focus.

Certainly, I haven’t seen any numbers indicating a big influx of what people might call “voter fraud,” such as people voting more than once or voting with a fraudulent identity, votes being cast by illegal aliens or others using false identity, voting more than once, etc.

Having said that, voter fraud may not be rampant in this country but there are undeniable instances on the public record. Last month, for example, an undercover investigative journalist in Houston exposed the Regional Field Director at Organizing for America (OFA) engaging in election fraud by helping the journalist, posing as a voter, to vote twice, once in Texas and again in Florida. The activity was caught on video tape which you can view here: http://www.theprojectveritas.org/voterfraud1012b   The OFA worker was later fired.

This type of incident should make all of us stand up and take notice.

We’ve also seen another type of voting irregularity which involves groups offering inducements to people to have them vote in a certain way or for a particular party and this constitutes election bribery.

Whether there are enough instances of fraud or voting irregularities to sway an election this year, I’m not sure.  However, regardless of whether it sways an election, this kind of activity is obviously illegal and is something that needs to be taken seriously and be dealt with in the big picture just like any other crime.

One particular district attorney with whom I’m familiar said he had to investigate a claim of voter fraud involved an elderly woman who had voted early and simply forgot that she had voted with an absentee ballot and voted a second time.  These kinds of instances need to be reviewed and dealt with on a case-by-cases basis.

Sometimes an election activity that may seem to be “shady” is truly in the eye of the beholder. For example, giving rides to get voters to the polls or if a voter is offered anything of value in exchange for voting. That becomes a concern. “Hey, come on and have a free lunch on us before you get out and vote.” When this occurs, there is some concern about whether this can be considered election bribery.  Is the voter being offered something of value? Or is it merely a case of someone wanting to help make sure that another voter isn’t disenfranchised, prevented from being able to vote. There are other instances on the record where Milwaukee voters were offered cigarettes or a free barbecue in exchange for accepting a ride to the polls and agreeing to vote in a certain way.

My word of caution to our readers is that, if you are offered something of value or in consideration of doing something connected to an election, accepting that item or consideration will raise eyebrows in the district attorney’s office in your particular municipality because they may very well consider this some kind of attempt to influence a vote for a particular person or ideology and, therefore, would fall under the category of election bribery.

Bearing these things in mind as we get set to go to the polls on Nov. 6, Wisconsinites need to be aware of the kinds of activities that our state finds against the law.  Here are some of the highlights of the state statutes on this matter:

  • Election threats – No person may personally or through an agent make use of or threaten to make use of force, violence or restraint in order to induce or compel any person to vote or refrain from voting at an election. (This includes impeding or preventing the free exercise of the franchise at an election, or voting for or against a particular candidate or referendum.)
  • Election bribery – The term “anything of value” includes any amount of money, or any object which has utility independent of any political message it contains and the value of which exceeds $1.  This includes offering items of value to go to or refrain from going to the polls, vote or refrain from voting, vote for or refrain from voting for or against a particular person, referendum; receive or accept any money, gift, loan, valuable consideration, office or employment personally or for any other person.
  • Election fraud – Violations include voting at any election without having the necessary elector qualifications or meeting the residency requirements; falsely procuring registration or making false statements to the municipal clerk, board of election commissioners or other election officials; impersonating a registered elector or posing as another person in order to vote; voting more than once in the same election; showing his or her marked ballot to any person or placing a mark upon the ballot so it is identifiable as his or her ballot; procuring an official ballot and neglecting or refusing to cast or return it.

Make no mistake – breaking our election laws is serious business. Making election threats is a Class 1 felony with penalties ranging from fines up to $1,000 and up to 6 months in prison or both. Committing election fraud is even more serious with fines up to $10,000 and up to 9 months in prison or both.

Perhaps most importantly this election season, cooler heads need to prevail. Again, there is a deep political polarization running in this state and in this country. But we can’t afford to let bitter feelings give way threats, bribery, fraud or violence. Our state and our country deserve far better.

About Attorney Mark Powers
Attorney Mark Powers is a partner at the criminal defense law firm of Huppertz & Powers, S.C. in Waukesha. Previously, Powers served as an Assistant District Attorney with the Waukesha County District Attorney's office as well as a municipal judge in North Prairie. He currently focuses in the area of criminal defense, and has handled many cases involving operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, domestic disputes, and drug offenses.

Powers attended Valparaiso University School of Law, where he received his Juris Doctorate. Prior to law school, Mark attended the University of Wisconsin, Lacrosse where he received his bachelor of science in Political Science.

For more information, please call 262.549.5979 or visit www.waukeshacriminalattorneys.com.

DICK STEINBERG

5:12 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

Mark. the more talk about potential voter fraud there is the more harm there is to the elective system. there will always be people who test the system to see if they can get away with it. there is no proof that there is a concerted political effort to taint the upcoming elections. voter suppression is much more important because it precludes normal American people from voting. Although our system is not foolproof it is the best there is. Cordially. Dick Steinberg. Valparaiso 1955.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roland hall

5:50 pm on Sunday, October 21, 2012

Wow Dick, you are so naive - we are smothered in proof, everywhere - Have you been living in a cave?

Comment_arrow

Adam Wienieski

12:08 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012

If we aren't looking for it how will we ever find it? Proof of the concerted political effort to taint the upcoming elections by Democratic Field Director Patrick Moran:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gT77qP2Nai8

Craig

5:23 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

Mark: I have been called on the day of prior elections, offering me a ride to the polls. They first asked who I would be voting for, and I lied to see where they would go from there. This is when they offered me a ride to cast my vote.
Am I breaking any law by accepting the ride, casting my vote for the other party, and walking out the back door to leave the driver waiting for me?

Reply
Comment_arrow

DICK STEINBERG

6:03 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

Driving voters to the polls has been around for ages. some organizations do it, some neighbors do it, some politicians do it and it is a good gesture to encourage people to vote. The eldedly, the disabled and the non-drivers need help to get to the polls, so help them.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

10:34 am on Friday, October 19, 2012

@Craig -

No, you would not be violating any law if you did what you are asking about doing.

Comment_arrow

Craig

3:06 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

So it is not illegal. Hmm. Not so sure it fits the ethical or moral code though.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

3:07 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

@Craig -

That's for you to decide.

Comment_arrow

Bert

4:41 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Craig, since Republicans are not bound by ethics or morals, you should be fine. Go right ahead and take advantage of someone who's trying to help others vote. It's only a dickish thing to do if you're not a Republican.

Comment_arrow

Craig

8:09 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Why Thank You Bert! I will think of your comment if or when the DNC calls me.

St. Swithin

7:35 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

A couple points about your example of the OFA worker:
1. No votes were actually cast.
2. O'Keefe heavily edited the video and won't release the undoctored version. He is well known for 'creative' editing.
So once again there is no evidence of voting fraud.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Avenging Angel

8:53 am on Friday, October 19, 2012

If I've ever seen a stick your head in the sand comment, it's this one.

Robert Merlin

4:05 am on Friday, October 19, 2012

When the Koch boys and Dave Siegel threaten their employes with layoffs if the president is reelected,is that not a bribe,or the very least voter intimidation?

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

10:31 am on Friday, October 19, 2012

@Robert Merlin -

NO - that would be what's called a reality check and advanced notice of possible lay-offs as required under federal law for companies of a certain size.

Comment_arrow

The Anti-Alinsky

12:25 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Oh yes, lets see how that thought process goes:
Barack Hussein Obama (hence-force for conciseness, BO): "If reelected, we will raise taxes on the wealthiest...especially the Koch Brothers."

David Koch: "Crap. That means we have to scarp that new intern program. Those millions are now going to have to pay for Obama's taxes."

Robert Merlin: "Sounds good, I'm not an intern."

BO: "I'm a genius"

(please note, this was not an actual conversation, and names have not been changed to protect the guilty)

Comment_arrow

mau

2:06 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

If a democrat candidate scares grandma or grandpa. that they are going to lose all their benefits if Romney wins, is this voter intimidation?

If a democrat candidate tells welfare recipients that they are going to lose their welfare if Romney wins, is this voter intimidation?

If a democrat tells women they will not be able to kill their unborn baby if Romney wins, is this voter intimidation?

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

2:54 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

This is one of those red herrings that are not worth discussing. Anyone who follows politics is aware of the Republican's program to suppress the vote of the traditionally Democratic voters.

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

3:00 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

@Lyle -

You mean preserve the integrity of the vote for all, not suppress the vote of the traditionally Democratic voter - that's just liberal propaganda nonsense!

Comment_arrow

Bob McBride

5:07 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Personally I find the whole concept of voter suppression to be a red herring, although when infused with a racial element by a certain well-known skinflint who shall remain nameless, it actually becomes more of a pickled herring.

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

5:13 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

@JRH...You really think an election is going to turn on some suspected illegal votes? I am more concerned about efforts to purge voter roles on the most specious evidence. This has been most problematic in Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania. If we are going to err, I would prefer to err on the side of maintaining voting laws that are the least restrictive as possible. Voter intimidation is a much more serious problem than fraudulent voting. If you had spent the time I have helping people to exercise their constitutional right to vote, I think you would have a different attitude and view the issue differently. One question; why didn't we see any of those billboards in the suburbs?

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

5:23 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

@Lyle -

Given how close recent elections have been, and the fact that several hundred new voter registration verification postcards were returned to the City of Racine as undeliverable as addressed in the recall election - you bet Hoffa believes that an election could be turned by voter fraud!

All it takes is a little fraud in the right places.

Couldn't you spend just as much time helping those people secure the correct photo ID if they don't already have one?

To answer your question, perhaps it's because a relatively small number of new registration verification post cards are returned to suburban municipalities as undeliverable as addressed following an election? Honestly, Hoffa was not involved in that action, so he really can't say for certain, although Hoffa believes that he has offered a logical explanation, yes?

TOM

7:12 am on Friday, October 19, 2012

If all of these people can come up with enough ID to recieve what they recieve on the taxpayer funded parasite programs they should be able to come up with proper ID to vote with.This is a scam at best another way the parasites can leech of the system thumbing thier noses at the providers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Common Sense Conservative

8:52 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

I agree to. Things you already need a photo I.D for.......

To drive
To attend the Democratic National Convention
Buy a car
Buy alcohol
Buy cigarettes
Bring metal to the metal recycling center
Buy spray paint
Buy a house
To get a cell phone contract
To get a passport
To serve on jury duty
To register a car
To get married
To board a plane
To get a hunting license
To get a fishing license
To get a PO box
To get a job
To get something notarized
To rent a car
To vote in a Union election
Get a library card
Buy cold medicine
Go to a rated R movie
Apply for food stamps
Apply for a building permit
Applying for a business license
Applying for permission to hold a protest or rally
Be admitted into a hospital
get a marriage license
To fill a prescription
Open a bank account
Apply for welfare
Apply for food stamps
rent an apartment
Collect Social Security
Cash a check
Write a check
Purchase a firearm
Make any large credit card purchase
To get a signature from Michelle Obama at her book signing

But having to produce an ID to vote once every couple of years, that's a real burden.

Comment_arrow

Craig

9:08 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Excellent examples Dave. The left will argue those are privileges, and voting is a right.
I went to the Dr. for a colonoscopy, and was asked for my ID.
I said to the nurse, "Why do you need my ID? The Dr. isn't even going to look at my face."
They explained to me the ID was needed to prevent insurance fraud and Identity theft.

Now I never thought that a colonoscopy was a privilege, I still don't ! :-P

Craig

9:36 am on Friday, October 19, 2012

A liberal aquaintence of mine informed me about a group he is a part of, who has kept track of all deaths in the past two years. The group is recruiting people to cast votes in the name of the dead people.
I know this is a crime, but is it punishable by more than a slap on the wrist?

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

10:32 am on Friday, October 19, 2012

@Craig -

If this is real, then it's conspiracy to commit fraud. Contact your local DA at once!

Comment_arrow

Craig

3:11 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

JRH: I considered doing just that, but I am also aware that these people have families. Kids who would not have the two parent home they have now, and loss of income.
I don't think they thought it out completely over the adult beverages. Craig will try to appeal to them by explaining Bubba as their potential cellmate.
The thought that there is such a list available is almost as bad as the intent.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

4:54 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

As the billboards state: Voter fraud is a felony, punishable by 3.5 years in jail and $10k fine...

Comment_arrow

Craig

4:58 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Cow:
3.5 years seems fair, but how are you gonna catch them? They cast the vote for a dead person and return to their home in another county, once they exit the polling place they are scott free. We do not check ID's, so there is almost no way to bust them, unless the poll worker personally knows the deceased.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

5:05 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Even then, it would be hard to catch them. Unless we get a voter ID law, the poll worker cannot ask for proof of ID, even if they suspect that the voter isn't who they claim to be.

Comment_arrow

Craig

5:18 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

I suppose the poll worker could call the police, but I assume the Police can't ask for ID either. How effed up is that?

Comment_arrow

CowDung

12:32 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012

Which is exactly why I don't accept the argument that the lack of prosecutions is proof that voter fraud isn't happening.

James R Hoffa

10:41 am on Friday, October 19, 2012

Voter fraud is a very real problem, whether people care to admit to it or not. Hoffa personally witnessed voter fraud while in college, whereby many of his fellow dorm-mates would return home to vote in their home districts (or vote by absentee ballot in their home districts) while also voting under the their residence in the dorms, thus permitting them to vote twice in the same election. There was actually a concerted effort by the campus college democrats to do this on a regular basis.

When Hoffa reported having personally witnessed such activity taking place to the local police and DA's office, he was told that they weren't interested in pursuing such a trivial matter.

Measuring the amount of voter fraud taking place by the number of convictions on the books is as accurate as measuring the amount of littering that takes place premised upon the number of convictions of the books! It's little more than a red-herring argument from the left!

Protect the sanctity of our elections - demand Voter ID!

Reply

DICK STEINBERG

12:10 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

There is no law or penalty for a citizen not having an ID. of course, life is easier if you have one. The statement that a violation of the election laws will cause concern to the District Attorney is not always true.

Reply

DICK STEINBERG

12:10 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

There is no law that says a citizen of the USA must have a voter ID and there is no criminal penalty for not having one.

Reply
Comment_arrow

The Anti-Alinsky

3:21 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Dick, most voting laws are set by individual states. Indiana has a well known Voter ID law since it recently was upheld by the United States Supreme Court.

Not having a voter ID isn't illegal. If you attempt to voter they will simply turn you away at the polls. IF you attempt to vote with an invalid ID, then (fake, someone elses,...) then that is a crime.

Nuitari

3:13 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

I love Ruble and his famous, delicious red herrings. Liberals toss that term around so often when there's a cover up. I'm surprised Barrack Hussein didn't call the embassy attack one yet. Any ways, I'll agree that voter fraud isn't a huge problem...yet. It does exist though Lyle, you can not deny that.

Reply

Bert

4:38 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Voter intimidation, voter caging, and voter registration fraud, as the GOP employee in Virginia has just been arrested for, are significantly more widespread and damaging than the virtually non-existing voting fraud that the right wing is perpetually caterwauling about. If Republicans were really interested in the "integrity" of the electoral process, they wouldn't hire contractors who have been guilty of registration fraud in the past to conduct their registration drives. (Yes, it is ILLEGAL to collect voter registration and decide to discard ones you don't like). Republicans would scream bloody murder at the 100% predictable (and ILLEGAL) fliers circulated in minority districts, informing everyone of the incorrect election day. They would be incensed at the idea of some extremist group sending "poll watchers" with the purpose to harass and intimidate voters, and to otherwise create confusion at the polls. These illegal activities have a much greater impact on election integrity than any degree of voter fraud ever has or ever will. Vote suppression tactics are a shame to any community that considers itself a democracy. Anyone who abides voter suppression has no right to consider himself part of a democracy. Any institution that abides voter suppression has no place in our public arena.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig

4:42 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

So the Tooth Fairy is real but Santa Claus is not?

Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

5:16 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

@Bert -

You're absolutely right - the New Black Panthers pose a serious threat to our republic, but Eric Holder refuses to do anything about their voter suppression tactics.

DICK STEINBERG

6:09 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

for clarification, it is not illegal to not have an ID, voter or otherwise. the idea of a voter ID is limited to voting. non-voters do not need one. there are just some people for whatever who do not have a voter ID, i.e., disabled, cannot travel, is a student, is employed where frequent travel is necessary, has no transportation, etc.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig

8:13 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

The UW schools updated student IDs just in case voter ID becomes law- again.

Tansandy

6:21 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012

You know the liberals motto? Vote early and vote often!

Reply

NObama 2012

6:31 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012

We need to go back to the concept of having to own property in order to vote. Why should someone who does actually pay taxes in this town be able to vote for someone who is going to determine the level of taxes the minority of us property owners pay? Is that fair? I say not, since they do not have a reasonable self-interest in how residents are taxed. I also feel the same way about income taxes. Should anyone who does not actually pay income taxes be able to elect those who will set the income tax rates and determine how tax dollars are spent? Democracy will fail when the people discover they can vote themselves money....it already has.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

8:57 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012

@NObama 2012...I disagree with your premise about linking property ownership to voting rights. Anyone who is a citizen has the right to vote and should exercise that right. Those renting are also indirectly paying property taxes since their landlords pass on the taxes through rent paid. On your second point, it is possible to earn income without acquiring any tax liability because of the vast number of deductions. Your system is not only unworkable but is fundamentally flawed.

DICK STEINBERG

11:38 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012

I have no problem with having an ID or drivers license to vote. what is the system for the honest good American citizens who go to vote and have none. no disrespect but my wife changes purses causing a search for her license ID. I can also imagine a person leaving a medical office or a hospital and cannot find the ID after being required to give it up for photocopying. and...........have you ever heard "where's my wallet?". can these people vote and is it counted ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig

8:21 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012

Dick: They would get to vote on a provisional ballot. Prior to the canvass of the votes, the individual would have to provide the ID.

Keith Best

5:09 pm on Sunday, October 21, 2012

Before it was exposed as a radical dishonest group working for Democrats, ACORN worked in Wisconsin for years. This is only one of the reasons we need photo ID for honest elections.

Reply

Nick Poulos

5:45 pm on Sunday, October 21, 2012

Can't we stop this destructive line of conversation?
Human beings are not inherently evil."Voter Fraud" has been manufactured by the word-smithing researchers the Republicans, Tea Party Radicals, and Randians have all paid to scare the be-jeezus out of us during an election.
I quote old M.H. again, since I see evidence all the more frequently on patch.com:
"What is most thought-provoking in this thought-provoking time is that we are still not thinking."
Misdirection and fear- these are the most common components of the targeted and segmented messages blanketing the nation. Tubal Detoxification is a must before election day. Somehow we have allowed free rein to the richest so that they might be able to buy the helm of the Ship of State.
The lies, distortion of facts, misdirection, and subtle-, and overt-, fear-mongering has gone so far as to warrant facing criminal charges for the content.
Isn't the election really about the morals, ethics, and social contract that we say that we want with one another in our nation? It appears to be that black and white (no: no pun intended, for the bigots such as NOBAMA). Namely, we are asked to choose between a sitting president who has brought us far from the ruins of Republican Hell, a president who believes in supporting a goal of a sustainable planet and an inclusionary democratic republic. The Romney Ryan ticket by contrast embraces and idolizes the Ayn Rand immoral ethics of Objectivism.
It really is that simple, isn't it?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig

9:33 pm on Sunday, October 21, 2012

Nick: I think you are the solution to the energy crisis, we just need to put windmills out in your front yard.
Human beings ARE evil. You know this. It is demonstrated every night on the news.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

2:15 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

Nick:

You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.

You are constantly posting your crap about the impending doom that will happen should Ryan and Romney be elected, along with lies and distortions associated with their positions. With all of your fear mongering, I cannot believe that you have the gall to blame 'Republicans, Tea Party Radicals, and Randians for scaring the be-jeezus out of us'...

Comment_arrow

H.E. Pennypacker

2:29 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

If voter fraud doesn't exist, then why are there so many people convicted of voter fraud? Would you like names? Public records are full of them.

DICK STEINBERG

5:56 pm on Sunday, October 21, 2012

craig. thats ok but what if the student has to travel back and miss more classes, or the disabled person cannot get a ride back or just does not come back after the election is over ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Craig

9:30 pm on Sunday, October 21, 2012

Not sure what you mean about the student traveling back... they vote on campus.
Those who do not come back for verification likely wouldn't vote anyway.
It is a non issue.

Lyle Ruble

2:25 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

A question to my conservative friends: If the Democrats should prevail will you blame it on voter fraud?

Reply
Comment_arrow

James R Hoffa

3:19 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

@Lyle -

If there is evidence of voter fraud, such as hundreds or thousands of new voter registration verification postcards being returned as undeliverable as addressed, then it's a possibility.

But absent some sort of concrete proof, conservatives usually don't fly off the rails very easily and succumb to blind speculation, conjecture, assumption, supposition, etc, unlike the blue fister crowd of the liberal left.

Hope that answers your question.

Comment_arrow

Neil John Smith

4:36 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

If the Dems prevail I blame it on social media and fast food.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

4:42 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

I'll blame it on Nick Poulos' fear-mongering and bigotry...

...as well as social media and fast food.

morninmist

4:53 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

Interesting article.

Deb Bush ‏@DebBush1

Can the GOP win without lies? The man behind the voter fraud myth http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/the_man_behind_the_voter_fraud_myth/ … via @Salon #WIUnion

...And on von Spakovsky’s book, which presents the following conspiracy theory:

“’Who’s Counting?’ opens with an insinuating account of how Al Franken, the Minnesota Democrat, was elected to the Senate in 2008. According to the book, there is ‘compelling’ evidence, compiled by a citizens’ watchdog group, that ’1,099 ineligible felons voted illegally’ in the contest—’more than three times’ Franken’s victory margin. The subhead of the chapter is ‘Would Obamacare have passed without voter fraud?’

Fox News and other conservative media outlets have promoted this argument. However, Mike Freeman, the Hennepin County Attorney, who oversees Minneapolis, told me, ‘Those numbers are fraudulent. We investigated, and at the end of the day, out of over four hundred allegations in the county, we charged thirty-eight people. Their research was bad, sloppy, incredible. They are just liars.’”

Jan ‏@Janbroni

In 18 seconds, Tommy Thompson shows he has no understanding of the debt, Medicare, or Social Security. http://pccc.me/RdEvbs #p2 #wiunion

Reply

morninmist

5:03 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

The Overpass Light Brigade does fantastic work.

I heard on the news that Clear channel will be taking down these vile billboards.

@Progress2day

.@OLBLightBrigade Responds to Voter Suppression in #Milwaukee & Clear Channel Billboards http://bit.ly/Seg6T3 #wiunion #wiright #p2 #p2b

Reply
Comment_arrow

CowDung

5:14 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

Please explain what is so 'vile' about these billboards?

Is voter fraud not a felony punishable by 3.5 years and a $10k fine?

Comment_arrow

morninmist

6:56 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

#Cow

I am glad to see clear channel doing what is right---finally.
Your question will be answered by this article.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/10/22/1056571/voter-intimidation-billboards-will-be-pulled-down-in-cleveland/
Voter Intimidation Billboards Will Be Pulled Down In Cleveland

By Ian Millhiser on Oct 22, 2012 at 10:30 am

Earlier this month, dozens of billboards suddenly appeared in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods in Cleveland referring to stiff jail sentences facing the rare individuals who commit voter fraud:

In the wake of complaints that the billboards’ true purpose was to intimidate minority voters from casting fully legal votes, the billboards are now being pulled down. Clear Channel Outdoor, which rented the billboard space to an unnamed family foundation, explained that they decided to remove the billboards because they “violate our policy of not accepting anonymous political ads.” Clear Channel also agreed to donate 10 billboards that will display a counter-message clarifying that voting is a right and not a crime:

Comment_arrow

CowDung

8:30 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

If someone is indeed casting a fully legal vote, why would they be intimidated by billboards reminding people that casting fraudulent votes is illegal?

Nick Poulos

6:53 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

rotflol: the morals of Ayn Rand, the distortion and misdirection and lies of Ryan and Romney: those are real issues that should be of concern to all of us.
But there are those of you who applaud these issues, and so I can only say more power to you - I hope you recover.
Even more than before after reading this, l feel compelled again to share this apothegm from Heidegger: "What is most thought-provoking in this thought-provoking time is we are still not thinking."
What is more worrisome than some fear being promulgated by the Tea Party and Republicans about "voter fraud" is the proven fact that certain very visible uber-wealthy Republicans such as the Koch Bros., who are threatening their employees
by telling them they will lose their jobs if the President wins re-election. That is a horrible and unfair threat; and, it is a danger to our free election process.
- @CowDung, since you called me out 2x's, I can only surmise that you prefer the immoral to the ethical. How's that working out for you? at home? with your wife and kids? at your job? Over time it won't!
My hope and my prayers are that more people see the truth and stay the course with Obama. best to all/ngp

Reply
Comment_arrow

CowDung

9:04 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

Nick:

Try rereading the crap that you post and then think again about who's the real fear monger. G-d forbid that someone prefers 'atheistic self-centered drivel' over the anti-atheistic, self-centered drivel that you keep spewing. If that's how you choose to define 'immoral', then I think I'm OK with that--I know the real truth.

morninmist

7:02 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

Voter fraud billboards that drew complaints of racism and intimidation will come down, Clear Channel says

http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2012/10/voter_fraud_billboards_that_dr.html

Patrick O'Donnell, The Plain Dealer By Patrick O'Donnell, The Plain Dealer
on October 21, 2012 at 12:00 AM, updated October 22, 2012 at 8:33 AM


Donaldson, The Plain Dealer

CLEVELAND, Ohio --,,,,

Jim Cullinan, a spokesman for Clear Channel Outdoor, said the billboards will come down immediately. He said the company continues its donation of 10 other billboards that will have messages to counter the offending ones...

Cleveland's black community and civil rights activists begain complaining earlier this month about the billboards, which state that voter fraud is punishable by up to 3½ years in prison and a $10,000 fine. The ads also show a gavel.

The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, a voting advocacy group based in Washington, D.C., noted that the billboards were placed in predominantly Hispanic and black neighborhoods in Cleveland, as well as in Cincinnati and Milwaukee.,,

,,,,Opponents had already negotiated with Clear Channel to have the company donate use of 10 billboards that will be visible Monday and carry the message

"Voting Is a Right. Not a Crime!" Cleveland City Council will pay for five more to carry the same message.....more..

Reply
Comment_arrow

morninmist

1:21 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

sounds to me like TeaGOP trickery. YUP

Leave a comment