Gov. Scott Walker on Wednesday apparently drove the final nail into the coffin of calls to end same-day voter registration in Wisconsin, vowing to veto any such bill that imposed additional costs.
“If it has a price tag, absolutely,” Walker told the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism in an interview at the Executive Residence, when asked if he would use his veto pen. “There’s no way we’re spending money on something like that."
The idea of ending same-day voter registration gained currency after Walker made a speech in California last month in which he suggested ending the state’s practice of letting voters register on Election Day, citing the burden it placed on poll workers. Two Republican lawmakers began seeking sponsors on a bill to accomplish this in the GOP-controlled state Legislature.
But the idea drew heavy opposition from critics, including some local election officials, and the state Government Accountability Board estimated it would cost the state $5.2 million to develop alternative registration systems required by federal law. The idea also suffered a setback when it emerged that Walker’s son, accompanied by his father, registered at the polls last August.
Walker, a Republican, has previously said he would not sign a bill that included this price tag, but did not promise to veto it. In Wisconsin, bills neither signed nor vetoed become law.
Rep. Joel Kleefisch (R-Oconomowoc) has said he remains interested in exploring the idea.
But on Wednesday, as part of a series of year-end interviews with the news media, Walker said he would veto any bill that imposed any additional cost. Asked how much was too much to stave off his veto pen, Walker said, “To me, cost, period, I’m not interested.”
Right-to-work legislation not a priority
Walker also further distanced himself from talk that Wisconsin might pursue so-called right-to-work legislation, preventing unions from requiring employees to join or pay dues.
“Someday there may be a debate about that,” Walker said. “But in the next two years, I don’t think there will be.”
Walker said the conditions that led to Michigan’s new right-to-work law are not present in Wisconsin, adding that he is eager to get past the protests, recall elections and uncertainty that have marked his first two years in office.
“All those things have been huge distractions towards employers, particularly small businesses, growing more jobs in the state of Wisconsin,” he said.
Walker vows to 'double down' on job creation
These protests and recalls, Walker said, greatly complicated his goal of adding 250,000 new private sector jobs by the end of his term, two years from now. He said these events, spurred by his curbs on collective bargaining and union rights for public employees, created a climate of uncertainty for state businesses, even though most of them “liked what we did.”
Walker took issue with a recent published report that the state has seen a net gain of just 25,000 jobs, saying “the raw data shows” that 86,000 jobs were created through June. (PolitiFact Wisconsin examined Walker’s job-numbers claim and rated it “Pants on Fire.”) But while Walker remains committed to his goal of adding 250,000 jobs overall, he acknowledged he may not make it.
“I concede it’s hard,” Walker said. “I have to hunker down. I have to double down. We talk about our budget, it’s going to be about creating jobs, developing the workforce, investing in education. Those are the things that will help us get to that goal.”
Bill Lueders is a reporter and columnist for the nonprofit Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism (www.WisconsinWatch.org), which collaborates with Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television, other news media and the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication.
All works created, published, posted or disseminated by the center do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its affiliates.
Bren: Please explain how redistricting would have any effect on the governor's race...
It's being tracked.
Here you go Steve. It's even from Fox. "I want my cabinet secretaries to have branded across their heads, `250,000 jobs,"' Walker said at a recent meeting of the Dairy Business Association. "I want them to know their job is on the line because my job is on the line to create 250,000 jobs in the private sector."
I hope you realize that Walker just won the recall in June. Furthermore, in the Presidential election which Obama won, Walker had support of over 55% of voters in exit polls, which correlated to the Obama/Romney results. That was also in a higher democratic turnout election than was in June. Therefore to say Walker is "unlikely to be re-elected" really shows your ignorance. However, you really show your lack of intelligence on political issues when referring to Walker losing in 2014 despite "redistricting." Just an FYI, for your small knowledge bank, but redistricting has no effect on statewide political races such as governor, AG, Senators etc... Redistricting only matters for the State Assembly & Senate, US Congressional and various local races to an extent. Governorships, US Senators and other statewide races are unaffected by redistricting because Wisconsin IS the district and everyone in the state can vote for the office.
Please
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/gop-redistricting-plan-created-paradox-of-wisconsin-politics-h67v4et-182899091.html
The more telling sign is that they (except for Vocke - you somehow conveniently forgot to mention that he held a DA seat in Villas Cty as a Democrat) were appointed to the GAB by Gov. Doyle...and you know darn well that Diamond Jim would not appoint anyone to any position that had even a modicum of conservative leaning.
I think you mean Obama, don't you?
If you feel so strongly about the things you think Governor Walker has done, you must be livid about Obama's actions. He actually has blood on his hands. It it sad that lefties can not even discuss the actual issues described in the blog. It would diminish the hate, if they agree with the Governor's actions. And we know that there is nothing the left likes more than hate and conflict.
Who is your comment directed at? If it was towards me, I'd be happy to point you to the source for my post.
the 'sha guy, it's difficult to "converse" with someone who contradicts themselves within two sentences. Do I lack intelligence or do I have a small knowledge bank, or is it a combo package? If I'm unintelligent, should you use big scary words like "various" and confusing acronyms like "FYI" and "AG?" If my knowledge bank is small, these terms might also be confusing. And especially if its option #3 unintelligent and uninformed, well I'm a just a hopeless case, aren't I? Thank you for the chuckle though. ; )
Other uninformed liberals is the answer.
I like how you completely ignored your own ignored your own foolish statements about redistricting. Any thoughts on that? Just so you are aware, lacking intelligence and a having a small knowledge bank is in fact the same trait. I know like the redistricting plan, it may be hard for you to comprehend. Did you really believe that redistricting would help Walker win re-election? Plus, the fact you have friends, who either didn't understand why there was a recall or thought it was illegal to vote in one, is really a pretty sad statement about society and a reflection on you. Not really surprising though. I find most liberals vote on emotion, are easily persuaded, and are pretty uninformed on the issues.
So bren, people thought it was illegal to vote in a recall? Give me a fcking break. If they are honestly that dumb to begin with, they shouldn't be voting anyway. Odds are you are lying to try to make a point, like most liberals do. Sickening.
I love watching these idiots say the most ignorant things, yet keep on chugging away with their ignorant comments even after being proved WRONG!! Ignorant, and loud-mouthed. Just great.